Research in psychology covers two main fields: furthering the understanding of the whole, complex gamut of processes that are involved in everyday human experience and behavior and developing methods for treating mental health problems. While the ethics of research and practice in this latter field falls largely within the general ambit of medical ethics, psychology research outside this domain involves some quite specific ethics issues in addition to those common across social sciences. Professional bodies of psychologists have developed specific codes and guidance for the ethical conduct of research, offering best practice guidance. There are several enduring ethics concerns for psychology researchers that are covered in this chapter. These include the validity of consent, how to ethically manage withholding information from participants, or deceiving them, where this is a necessary part of the research design. Also, with the growth in Internet-based research, genomics, and neuroimaging, psychologists have had to develop new ways of maintaining standards and compliance with ethical principles of the discipline. New approaches have required development to manage issues of consent, especially with children and young people.
Keywords
- Psychology; Research ethics; Deception; Neuroscience; Children; Consent; Internet-mediated research; Replicability; Ethics codes
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Aarts AA et al. (2015) Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349:943–950 Google Scholar Altus D, Morris E (2009) B. F. Skinner’s utopian vision: behind and beyond Walden Two. Behav Anal 32:319–335 CrossRef Google Scholar American Psychological Association (2017) Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC Google Scholar Bakker M, van Dijk A, Wicherts J (2012) The rules of the game called psychological science. Perspect Psychol Sci 7:543–554 CrossRef Google Scholar Banks S (2018) Cultivating researcher integrity: virtue-based approaches to research ethics. In: Emmerich N (ed) Virtue ethics in the conduct and governance of social science research. Bingley, Emerald Google Scholar Bohannon J (2015) Many psychology papers fail replication test. Science 349:910–911 CrossRef Google Scholar Boynton M, Portnoy D, Johnson B (2013) Exploring the ethics and psychological impact of deception in psychological research. IRB 35:7–13 Google Scholar British Psychological Society (2005) Declaration concerning torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment. British Psychological Society, Leicester Google Scholar British Psychological Society (2014) Code of human research ethics. British Psychological Society, Leicester Google Scholar References
British Psychological Society (2015) Guidance on teaching and assessment of ethical competence in psychology education. British Psychological Society, Leicester
Google Scholar
British Psychological Society (2017) Ethics guidelines for Internet-mediated research. INF206/04.2017. Leicester. //www.bps.org.uk/publications/policy-and-guidelines/research-guidelines-policy-documents/researchguidelines-poli
British Psychological Society (2018) Code of ethics and conduct. British Psychological Society, Leicester
Google Scholar
Budin-Ljøsne I, Teare HJA, Kaye J, Beck S, Bentzen HB, Caenazzo L, Collett C, D’Abramo F, Felzmann H, Finlay T, Javaid MK, Jones E, Katić V, Simpson A, Mascalzoni D (2017) Dynamic consent: a potential solution to some of the challenges of modern biomedical research. BMC Med Ethics:1–10
Google Scholar
Cummings JA, Day TE (2019) But what do participants want? Comment on the “data sharing in psychology” special section (2018). Am Psychol 74:245–247
CrossRef Google Scholar
Emmerich N (2018) Virtue ethics in the conduct and governance of social science research. Emerald Publishing, Bingley
CrossRef Google Scholar
Gigerenzer G (2015) On the supposed evidence for libertarian paternalism. Rev Philos Psychol 6:361–383
CrossRef Google Scholar
Haney C, Banks C, Zimbardo P (1973). A study of prisoners and guards in a simulated prison. Naval Res Rev 9: 1-17. Office of Naval Research, Washington, DC
Google Scholar
Herrera CD (2001) Ethics, deception, and ‘those milgram experiments’. J Appl Philos 18:245–256
CrossRef Google Scholar
Kimmel J (1996) Ethical issues in behavioral research. Blackwell, Oxford
Google Scholar
Lindsay G, Koene C, Øvreeide H, Lang F (2008) Ethics for European psychologists. Göttingen, Hogrefe
Google Scholar
Milgram S (1963) Behavioral study of obedience. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 67:371–378
CrossRef Google Scholar
Orwell G (1949) Nineteen eighty-four. Secker and Warburg, London
Google Scholar
Rest J (1982) A psychologist looks at the teaching of ethics. Hast Cent Rep 12:29–36
CrossRef Google Scholar
Rozemond M (1998) Descartes’ dualism. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Google Scholar
Sclenker B, Forsyth D (1977) On the ethics of psychological research. J Exp Soc Psychol 13:369–396
CrossRef Google Scholar
Skinner BF (1948) Walden two. Macmillan, New York
Google Scholar
Skinner BF (1985) Cognitive science and behaviourism. Br J Psychol 76:291–301
CrossRef Google Scholar
Weisberg DS, Keil FC, Goodstein J, Rawson E, Gray JR (2008) The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. J Cogn Neurosci 20:470–477
CrossRef Google Scholar
Wickelgren I (1999) Discovery of ‘gay gene’ questioned. Science 284:571
CrossRef Google Scholar
Yanow D, Schwartz-Shea P (2018) Framing “deception” and “covertness” in research: do milgram, humphreys, and zimbardo justify regulating social science research ethics? Forum Qual Soc Res 19:1–31
Google Scholar
Download references
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
John Oates
Authors
- John Oates
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Corresponding author
Correspondence to John Oates .
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Chatelaillon Plage, France
Dr. Ron Iphofen
Rights and permissions
Reprints and Permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Oates, J. (2019). Ethical Considerations in Psychology Research. In: Iphofen, R. (eds) Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer, Cham. //doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_35-1