Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. To access this article, please contact JSTOR User Support
. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader. With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free. Get StartedAlready have an account? Log
in
Monthly Plan - Access everything in the JPASS collection
- Read the full-text of every article
- Download up to 10 article PDFs to save and keep
$19.50/month Yearly Plan - Access everything in the JPASS collection
- Read the full-text of every article
- Download up to 120 article PDFs to save and keep
$199/year Log in through your institution
Purchase a PDF Purchase this article for $39.00 USD. How does it work?- Select the purchase option.
- Check out using a credit card or bank account with PayPal
.
- Read your article online and download the PDF from your email or your account.
journal article Bureaucracy and Reform in the West: Notes on the Influence of a Neglected Interest Group Western Historical Quarterly Vol. 2, No. 3 (Jul., 1971)
, pp. 295-305 (11 pages) Published By: Oxford University Press https://doi.org/10.2307/967836 https://www.jstor.org/stable/967836 Read and download Log in through your school or library Alternate access options For independent researchers
Read Online Read 100 articles/month free Subscribe to JPASS
Unlimited reading + 10 downloads Purchase article $39.00 - Download now and later
Journal Information Founded in 1969, The Western Historical Quarterly, the official journal of the Western History Association, presents original scholarly articles dealing with the North American West - the westward movement from the Atlantic to the Pacific, twentieth-century regional studies, the Spanish borderlands, Native American history, and developments in western Canada, northern Mexico, Alaska, and Hawaii. Each
issue contains reviews and notices of significant books in the field, as well as bibliographic lists of recent articles and dissertations. The Western Historical Quarterly is published for the Western Historical Association by Utah State University, and the Department of History, Utah State University. Publisher Information Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the
University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. OUP is the world's largest university press with the widest global presence. It currently publishes more than 6,000 new publications a year, has offices in around fifty countries, and employs more than 5,500 people worldwide. It has become familiar to millions through a diverse publishing program that includes scholarly works in all academic disciplines, bibles, music, school and college
textbooks, business books, dictionaries and reference books, and academic journals. Rights & Usage This item is part of a JSTOR Collection. For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions Western Historical Quarterly © 1971
Oxford University Press Request Permissions Principles of Politics Exercise
Goals of This Exercise - Illustrate the historical decline of presidential control over executive branch appointments and personnel.
- Demonstrate how rule and procedural changes in executive branch hiring decisions caused this loss of control over time.
- Examine how a decline in presidential control in executive
hiring might affect presidential control over bureaucracy.
Political Appointment versus Merit Selection in the Executive Branch Political Appointment - Employees selected based on politics and party loyalty
- Politically associated with president
- Easily controlled by president
- The spoils system
Merit Selection - Employees selected based on skills and qualifications
- Take civil service exam
- Immune
or insulated from political control
- Civil service (merit system)
Examining the Rationality Principle The Rationality Principle: all political behavior has a purpose. All political actors engage in instrumental acts designed to further their individual goals. - The goals of bureaucrats and the president differ in important respects.
- Bureaucrats seek to further the mission of their agency and to maximize its budget.
- For the
president, the task of democratic control of the bureaucracy is to impose his or her goals on the bureaucracy to the greatest extent possible.
- The conflict among these goals leads to a struggle over autonomy between the president and his or her political appointees, on the one hand, and merit-protected bureaucrats, on the other hand.
Examining the Policy Principle The Policy Principle: political outcomes are the products of individual preferences and
institutional procedures. - The rules and procedures by which federal employees are selected (i.e., rules promoting a spoils system versus rules promoting a merit system) matter in determining whether the president or the bureaucracy wins in the struggle over autonomy.
- When the president has greater control over selecting bureaucrats, he or she is more likely able to impose his or her preferences over bureaucrats. When bureaucrats owe their position only to their “merit”
and are insulated from political pressure, they have greater autonomy to pursue their own goals.
Historical Stages of Appointment Stage 1: The spoils system was originally instituted as a democratic reform during the Jacksonian era to provide for “rotation in office” that would make national government more representative of the rest of the country. Stage 2: Nepotism, favoritism, and corruption of the spoils system led to calls for yet more reform. This time
reformers wanted to institute a civil service system; although it would make the government less representative, it would also make the government more professional. Stage 3: The Pendleton Act (1883) instituted a civil service (or merit) system in some national government hiring. Stage 4: From the late nineteenth century to the 1960s, more and more of national government employees were selected by merit. Stage 5: Attempts are made to once again gain greater democratic and
political control over the federal bureaucracy. After the 1970s new politically-appointed positions were increasingly added to the federal workforce. Analyzing Executive
Appointments Examining the graph and the various stages (1–5) of appointment politics, answer the following questions: The Advent of Merit Selection
| 1. What new “rule” caused the jump in the percentage of merit-selected federal employees in the decade between 1881 and 1891?
|
| 2. What happened to merit selection between 1881 and 1921?
|
| 3. How did these changes in rules and procedures allow simultaneously for greater bureaucratic autonomy in the pursuit of their goals and a decline in the president’s ability to control the bureaucracy?
|
| Increasing Presidential Control In the 1960s, there was a significant increase in the number of federal employees in Senior Executive Service (SES) positions, who were politically appointed rather than selected based on merit. Throughout much of the twentieth century, presidents expanded the politically-appointed White House staff and increasingly turned to their staff rather than to
the Cabinet or the bureaucracy for policy development and some implementation. One Step Further… Examining the figure and the various stages (1–5) of appointment politics, answer the following questions:
| 4. What is the President’s likely aim in sprinkling SES personnel throughout the federal bureaucracy?
|
| 5. What advantages accrue to the president in his or her struggle with the bureaucracy for autonomy by increasingly using the White House staff rather than the merit-selected bureaucracy?
|
| 6. In what ways do these changes amount to at least a partial return of the spoils system?
|
| Citations - Milkis, Sidney. The President and the Parties. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
- Rourke, Francis E., “Presidentializing the Bureaucracy: From Kennedy to Reagan.” In James P. Pfiffner, ed., The Managerial Presidency. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1991.
- Stanley, Harold W., and Richard G. Niemi. Vital Statistics in American Politics.
5th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1995.
|
Submit to Gradebook:
First Name:
| Please enter your first name
| Last Name:
| Please enter your last name
| Your Email Address:
| Please enter your email address
| Your Professor's Email Address:
| Please enter your professor's email address
| Section:
|
|
|
|
What factor has contributed to the growth of the federal bureaucracy?
The Civil War sparked the creation of thousands of government jobs and new departments to handle the demands of warfare. After the war, the Industrial Revolution encouraged economic growth and more government agencies to regulate the expanding economy.
Why was the federal bureaucracy created?
Bureaucracies are created in government to carry out a broad range of tasks, to provide necessary services, and to act as experts in particular areas of policy.
What are the major elements of the federal bureaucracy?
Bureaucracies have three main features: structure, job specialization, and formal rules. A bureaucracy is organized like a pyramid with several levels. Each level reports to the level above it. This structure is often referred to as a hierarchy.
How did the bureaucracy change during the Progressive Era?
How did the bureaucracy change during the Progressive Era? The civil service reforms of the Progressive Era ENDED the spoils system and DECREASED the power of the party organizations.
|