If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on our website. Show If you're behind a web filter, please make sure that the domains *.kastatic.org and *.kasandbox.org are unblocked. SummaryIn the last two centuries, world agriculture succeeded in producing enough to provide more food per capita than ever before, in spite of an almost seven-fold increase in population, and to supply industries with raw materials, all using less land, capital, and labor per unit of output. Production can be augmented by using more inputs such as capital, labor, and land, and/or by using them more efficiently. This chapter highlights a key distinction between the number of agricultural workers and their share of the total workforce. The farmers have introduced thousands of innovations, which for the purpose of illustration can be grouped into four categories. They are new practices of cultivation, new plants and animals, chemical products, and machinery. In the economists' jargon, institutions can be defined as the set of formal or informal rules that determine the ownership of the goods and factors and regulate the interactions among individual agents or households. ReferencesAnderson, Kym, Croser, Johanna, Sandri, Damiano, and Valenzuela, Ernesto. “Agricultural distortion patterns since the 1950s: what needs explaining?” Agricultural Distortions Working Paper 90 (May 2009).Google Scholar Berry, R. Albert, and Cline, William R.. Agrarian Structure and Productivity in Developing Countries. Baltimore, md, and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979.Google Scholar Cline, W. R. Trade Policy and Global Poverty. Washington: Institute for International Economics, 2004.Google Scholar De Soto, H. The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else. London and New York: Bantam Press, 2000.Google Scholar Engerman, Stanley, and Sokoloff, Ken. “Factor endowment, institutions and differential paths of growth among New World economies.” In Haber, Stephen, ed., How Latin America Fell Behind: Essays on the Economic Histories of Brazil and Mexico. Stanford University Press, 1997, pp. 259–304.Google Scholar Federico, Giovanni. Feeding the World: An Economic History of Agriculture, 1800–2000. Princeton University Press, 2005.Google Scholar Federico, Giovanni. “The growth of world agricultural production, 1800–1938.” Research in Economic History 22 (2004), 125–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Federico, Giovanni. “The ‘real’ puzzle of share-cropping: why is it disappearing?” Continuity and Change 21 (2006), 261–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Gardner, Bruce. American Agriculture in the Twentieth Century: How It Flourished and What It Cost. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar Hayami, Yujiro, and Ruttan, Vernon. Agricultural Development: An International Perspective, 2nd edn. Baltimore, md, and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985.Google Scholar Jorgensen, Hans. “The interwar land reforms in Estonia, Finland and Bulgaria: a comparative study.” Scandinavian Economic History Review 54 (2006), 64–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar King, Russell. Land Reform. London: Bell and Sons, 1977.Google Scholar Kishimoto, Mio. “Property rights, land, and law in Imperial China.” In Ma, Debin and van Zanden, Jan Luiten, eds., Law and Long-term Economic Change: A Eurasian Perspective. Stanford University Press, 2011, pp. 68–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Lains, Pedro, and Pinilla, Vincente. Agriculture and Economic Development in Europe since 1870. London and New York: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar Larson, Donald, Butzer, Rita, Mundlak, Yair, and Crego, Al. “A cross-country database for sector investment and capital.” World Bank Economic Review 14 (2000), 371–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Marshall, Alfred. Principles of Economics, 8th edn. London: Macmillan, 1920.Google Scholar Martin, Will, and Mitra, Devashish. “Productivity growth and convergence in agriculture versus manufacturing.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 49 (2001), 403–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Nafziger, Steven. “Peasant communes and factor markets in late nineteenth-century Russia.” Explorations in Economic History 47 (2010), 381–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Olmstead, Alan, and Rhode, Paul. Creating Abundance: Biological Innovation and American Agricultural Development. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar Pardey, Philip, Alston, Julian, and Piggot, Roland. Agricultural R&D in the Developing World: Too Little, Too Late? New York: IFPRI, 2006.Google Scholar Pomeranz, Kenneth. “Land markets in late imperial and republican China.” Continuity and Change 23 (2008), 101–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Simpson, James. Creating Wine: The Emergency of a World Industry, 1840–1914. Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar Swinnen, Johan. “The growth of agricultural protection in Europe in the 19th and 20th centuries.” World Economy 32:11 (2009), 1499–1537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Van der Eng, Pierre. Agricultural Growth in Indonesia: Productivity Change and Policy Impact Since 1880. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Van Zanden, J. L. “The first Green Revolution: the growth of production and productivity in European agriculture, 1870–1914.” Economic History Review 44 (1991), 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Why is agriculture important in North America?This activity is a source of economic activity and jobs in these countries. In the U.S., agriculture and related industries provide 19.7 million full- and part-time jobs, about 10.3% of all employment.
Where was agriculture more important north or South?Only about 40 percent of the Northern population was still engaged in agriculture by 1860, as compared to 84 percent of the South.
How did agriculture change in the late 19th century in America?Knowing the fact that industrialization had been really successful during this time, allowed farmers to modernize their techniques. Farmers began to use new farming machinery such as the thresher and reaper, which made the growing of wheat much faster and efficient.
What was the economy of the north based on in the first half of the 19th century?Agriculture. The U.S. economy was primarily agricultural in the early 19th century.
|
