Under what conditions should an auditor issue an adverse audit opinion?

The first page of audited financial statements is the auditor’s report. This is an important part of the financials that shouldn’t be overlooked. It contains the audit opinion, which indicates whether the financial statements are fairly presented in all material respects, compliant with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and free from material misstatement.

In general, there are four types of audit opinions, ranked from most to least desirable.

1. Unqualified

A clean “unqualified” opinion is the most common (and desirable). Here, the auditor states that the company’s financial condition, position and operations are fairly presented in the financial statements.

2. Qualified

The auditor expresses a qualified opinion if the financial statements appear to contain a small deviation from GAAP but are otherwise fairly presented. To illustrate: An auditor will “qualify” his or her opinion if a borrower incorrectly estimates the reserve for a contingency, but the exception doesn’t affect the rest of the financial statements.

Qualified opinions are also given if the company’s management limits the scope of audit procedures. For example, a qualified opinion may have resulted if you denied the auditor access to year-end inventory counts due to safety concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic.

3. Adverse 

When an auditor issues an adverse opinion, there are material exceptions to GAAP that affect the financial statements as a whole. Here, the auditor indicates that the financial statements aren’t presented fairly. Typically, an adverse opinion letter outlines these exceptions.

4. Disclaimer

 Even more alarming to lenders and investors is a disclaimer opinion. Disclaimers occur when an auditor gives up in the middle of an audit. Reasons for disclaimers may include significant scope limitations, material doubt about the company’s going-concern status and uncertainties within the subject company itself. A disclaimer opinion letter briefly outlines the auditor’s reasons for throwing in the towel.

Beyond the opinion

Auditors’ reports for public companies also must include a discussion of so-called “critical audit matters” (CAMs). Essentially, these are the most complicated issues that arose during the audit. CAMs are specific to the engagement and the year of the audit. As a result, they’re expected to change from year to year.

This requirement represents a major change to the pass-fail audit opinions that have been in place for decades. It’s intended to give stakeholders greater insight into the company’s disclosures and the auditor’s work when issuing an unqualified opinion. Contact us for more information on audit opinions.

19 If the predecessor's report was issued before the effective date of this section and contained an uncertainties explanatory paragraph, a successor auditor's report issued or reissued after the effective date hereof should not make reference to the predecessor's previously required explanatory paragraph.

An adverse opinion is a statement made by an entity’s outside auditor, that the entity’s financial statements do not fairly represent its results, financial position, and cash flows.  The opinion may also be issued if certain required disclosures do not accompany the financial statements, or if the entity has not prepared its financial statements in conformity with the provisions of the applicable accounting framework. The auditor states the reason for this type of opinion within the report. This is an unusual outcome, since the auditor is normally able to convince the client to alter its financial statements to achieve a higher degree of reporting fairness. When an adverse opinion is rendered, the client is typically unable to issue the financial statements to outsiders, such as creditors, lenders, and investors.

Impact of an Adverse Opinion

When a publicly-held company receives an adverse opinion from its auditor, the stock exchange on which its shares are listed may force it to de-list from the exchange. It may also result in the firing of a firm’s CFO and controller, since they are responsible for the financial statements.

Under what conditions should an auditor issue an adverse audit opinion?

Our sites

  • myACCA
  • ACCA mail
  • ACCA Careers
  • ACCA Career Navigator
  • ACCA Learning Community
  • Your Future

Useful links

  • Make a payment
  • ACCA-X online courses
  • Find an accountant
  • ACCA Rulebook
  • News
  • Work for us

Most popular

  • Professional insights
  • ACCA Qualification
  • Member events and CPD
  • Supporting Ukraine
  • Past exam papers

Under what conditions would auditors issue an adverse opinion?

Adverse opinion. An adverse opinion states that the financial statements do not present fairly the financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the entity in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

Under what circumstances is an adverse opinion appropriate?

Understanding an Adverse Opinion Auditors will usually issue adverse opinions if the financial statements are constructed in a manner that materially deviates from generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).

Under what two conditions must an auditor issue a disclaimer of opinion?

This disclaimer may be given for several reasons. For example, the auditor may not have been allowed or been able to complete all planned audit procedures. Or, the client restricted the scope of the examination to such an extent that the auditor was unable to form an opinion.

When would the auditor of a public company be required to issue an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of internal controls?

4320.6The auditor must express an adverse opinion on the company's ICFR when one or more material weaknesses in ICFR exist, unless there is a restriction on the scope of the engagement. See Section 4320.12. An adverse opinion on ICFR must include: The definition of a material weakness; and.