Which of the following is the most sensitive indicator of a childs nutritional status?

INTRODUCTION

A better-nourished world is a better world. The global community is grappling with multiple burdens of malnutrition. Eighty-eight percent of countries face a serious burden of either two or three forms of malnutrition.[1] The World Bank estimates that India is one of the highest-ranking countries in the world for the number of children suffering from malnutrition. The prevalence of underweight children in India is among the highest in the world and is nearly double that of Sub Saharan Africa with dire consequences for mobility, mortality, productivity, and economic growth.[2]

The 2017 Global Hunger Index report ranked India 100 out of 119 countries with a serious hunger situation. India trails behind only a few countries such as North Korea, Bangladesh, and Iraq. The country's serious hunger level is driven by high child malnutrition and underlines the need for stronger commitment to the social sector.[3] Freedom from hunger and malnutrition is a basic human right, and their alleviation is a fundamental prerequisite for human and national development.[4]

Almost as shocking as the prevalence of malnutrition in India is the country's failure to reduce it much, despite rapid growth. Since 1991 Gross Domestic Product has more than doubled, while malnutrition has decreased by only a few percentage points.[5] Malnutrition continues to be the biggest health problem of our country today even after a lot of efforts put in by the Government towards eradicating it. Malnutrition commonly affects all groups in a community, but infants and young children are the most vulnerable because of their high nutritional requirements for growth and development.[6]

Nutritional status is the sensitive indicator of a child's health, and under-five children constitute the most vulnerable segment of any community.[7] The assessment of the nutritional status of this segment of the population is essential for improving overall health; prime determinant of health status in an adult is their nutritional status in childhood.[8] Adequate nutrition is a necessary first step in the improvement of quality of life. Nutrition plays a key role in the physical, mental, and emotional development of children, and much emphasis has been given to provide good nutrition to growing populations, especially in the formative years of life.[9] The growth rate is maximal during the first 6 years of life; hence malnutrition has a direct impact on infant mortality rate and under-five mortality rates, which are prime indicators of the health status of a country.[10]

Despite several achievements that the Integrated Child Development Services scheme has witnessed during its three decades of implementation, there remain some major challenges with regard to the high burden of child malnutrition in the country.[11]

National Nutrition Mission also called as Poshan Abhiyaan, is a flagship under Ministry of Women and Child Development was commenced from 2017 to 2018. The Mission targets reduction in the level of under-nutrition and other related problems by ensuring the convergence of various nutrition-related schemes. The Mission will address malnourishment through the life cycle concept by adopting a synergized and result oriented approach.[12]

Despite all these efforts, malnutrition is still prevalent in our country. There are many studies in the burden of malnutrition, but a comprehensive study is lacking, which takes into consideration the sociodemographic factors, dietary intake, physical and systemic examination, and anthropometric measurements of children.

Taking the above facts into consideration, the present study was taken up to assess the nutritional status of children of 6 months to 6 years of age in Anganwadi centers of this region.

Objectives of the study

  1. To assess the nutritional status of the children (6 months-6 years) in Anganwadis and to find out the prevalence of malnutrition
  2. To determine the socio-demographic factors associated with underweight, stunting, and wasting in children attending Anganwadis
  3. To assess the dietary intake of children attending the Anganwadis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted between November 2016 and May 2018 in the urban localities in the urban field practice area of a medical college, which have a total population of 18,000. Twelve Anganwadi centers located in the area were included for the data collection. Children aged 6 months–6 years in Anganwadis were the study subjects. Systematic random sampling was the sampling method used.

Sample size

Which of the following is the most sensitive indicator of a childs nutritional status?

With the prevalence of 40% (NFHS-3 data)[13] and relative precision of 10%, the sample size obtained was 580.

Methodology

Systematic random sampling was used to select a total of 580 children from 12 Anganwadis. All the children enrolled in all the 12 Anganwadis were line-listed, and every 3rd child in the list was selected for the study. Selected children were examined and mothers were interviewed using a pre-tested questionnaire to collect data regarding sociodemographic factors, dietary practice, and the health status of the children. Anthropometric measures were recorded in the Anganwadis. The standard measuring tape was used to measure height, and Salter's scale was used to record the weight of the children. Infantometer was used to measure the length of infants. After collecting the data, mothers were educated regarding the healthy food habits, hygiene, and factors affecting malnutrition. WHO Anthro and Anthro-plus software were used to calculate the weight for age, weight for height and height for age. WHO Z-scores were used. 24-h recall method was used to collect the diet history. Calculation of both the calories and proteins was done using two software applications “Healthify Me” and “Nutrify India Now” which follows the “National Institute of Nutrition” guidelines.

Data collected were entered on MS Excel spreadsheet (version 2010, Mahalaksmi computers, Tumkur, Karnataka, India). The data collected were analyzed and interpreted using the Epi Info version 7. Descriptive statistics (mean and proportions) and Chi-square test were employed. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

In the study, 38.62% belonged to age group 6–36 months and 61.38% belonged to age group 37–42 months. 50.34% were male and 49.66% were female children. 284 (48.97%) mothers studied till high school, 135 (23.28%) till middle school, and only 15 (2.59%) were illiterates. 80.52% belonged to nuclear families and only 3.10% to joint families. About 66.72% belonged to the Muslim religion and remaining belonged to Hindu religion. According to Modified Kuppuswamy Scale 2017, 23 (3.97%) belonged to the lower middle class, 436 (75.17%) belonged to the upper lower class, and 121 (20.86%) belonged to lower class. 465 (80.17%) had birth weight of 2.5–3.5 kg, 91.21% of children were completely immunized and 46.21% were exclusively breastfed for 6 months.

In our study, the overall prevalence of underweight, stunting, and wasting were found to be was 34.14%, 45.52% and 35.52%, respectively.

There was a statistically significant association between underweight and mother's education, family type, religion, and birth weight; between stunting and family type, socioeconomic status, and immunization status; between wasting and age, mother's education, religion, birth weight, and immunization status [Table 1].

Which of the following is the most sensitive indicator of a childs nutritional status?
Table 1:

Association between various sociodemographic factors and malnutrition

In the age group of 6–36 months, most of the children (89.29%) had a deficiency of calories and 64.73% were deficient in terms of protein intake. In the age group of 37–72 months, about 90.45% had a deficiency of calories, and about 64.89% had a deficiency in proteins.

DISCUSSION

In our study, 356 (61.38%) children belonged to age group 37–72 months and 224 (38.62%) children belonged to age group 6–36 months. A study conducted in Goa (2015) showed 64% belonged to age group 6–36 months, and only 36% belonged to 37–72 months.[14] In the study, 45.52% of children were stunted, 35.52% were wasted, and 34.14% were underweight. In studies in Gadag[15] and Mangalore[10] stunting varied from 35% to 55%, underweight varied from 24% to 60%, and wasting varied from 11% to 60%.

In our study, age was not associated with stunting and underweight, which was similar to the study in other parts of the country.[16171819] In the present study, the age of the child had a significant association with wasting, which was in agreement with various other studies[171819] and in contrast with the study in Jaipur.[16] In our study, gender was not associated with undernutrition (stunting, underweight, and wasting), which correlates with similar studies carried out in various parts of India[171819] but in contrary to study done in Jaipur.[16] In our study, mother's education was significantly associated with underweight and wasting, which was identical to other studies[171920] and in contrast with a few other studies.[1821] In this study, stunting was not associated with the education of mother, which is similar to studies done in other parts of India[152122] and disagrees with few studies done.[171920] In this study, the family type was associated with stunting and underweight in agreement with studies conducted in Mumbai[17] and contrary to studies.[181922]

Socioeconomic status was found to be associated with stunting, which correlated with various studies done in India[161719] and not in agreement with a few other studies.[1822] In the present study, religion was associated with underweight and wasting in agreement with a study carried out in the urban area in India.[18] In the present study, birth weight was associated with underweight, which correlated with various other studies[2122] but contrast to a study conducted in Mumbai.[17] Birth weight was also found to be associated with wasting contrast to studies in Mumbai and Pune.[1721]

CONCLUSION

The present study shows that there is still a high prevalence of undernutrition among the Anganwadi children aged 6–72 months. About 34.14% were underweight, 45.52% of children were stunted, and 35.52% of children were wasted. Socioeconomic factors such as mother's education, type of family, socioeconomic status, religion, birth weight, and immunization status had a significant association with undernutrition. Improving mothers' education, improved socioeconomic status, proper antenatal care, immunization of children under UIP should be focused on to prevent malnutrition.

Recommendations

Enhancement of education of mothers and caretakers regarding increased nutritional intake with increasing age, proper child-rearing and feeding practices, and improving hygiene and sanitation forms the basis of child's good health.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Development Initiatives. Global Nutrition Report 2017: Nourishing the SDGs. 2017 Bristol, UK Development Initiatives

2. World Bank. World Bank Annual Report 2017. 2017 Washington, DC World Bank

3. Von Grebmer K, Bernstein J, Hossain N, Brown T, Prasai N, Yohannes Y, et al Global hunger index: The Inequalities of Hunger. 2017 Washington, DC International Food Policy Research Institute; Bonn: Welthungerhilfe; and Dublin: Concern Worldwide

4. WHO. Nutrition for Health and Development.Last accessed on 2018 Aug 08 Available from: http://wwwwhoint/nutrition/nhd/en/

5. Pada G Putting the Smallest First The Economist; 23 September, 2010.Last accessed on 2018 Aug 08 Available from: https://wwweconomistcom/briefing/2010/09/23/putting-the-smallest-first

6. Navya N, Udayakiran N. A comparative study of anthropometric measurements of children attending urban and rural Anganwadi centres of a coastal district in Karnataka, India Int J Community Med Public Health. 2017;4:91–5

7. Renuka M, Jagadish K, Praveen K, Khyrunissa B, Gangadhar MR. Malnutrition among under-five children of Kadukuruba tribe: Need to reach the unreached J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8:1–4

8. Shivaprakash NC, Joseph RB. Nutritional Status of Rural School-Going Children (6-12 Years) of Mandya District, Karnataka Int J Sci Stud. 2014;2:39–43

9. Roopadevi V, Aravind K. Nutritional status assessment of under five children in urban field practice area of Mysore J Prev Med Holistic Health. 2016;2:1–3

10. Srinivasa SB, Dnyaneshwar B, Ajay U. Anthropometric measurement of weight for assessment of nutritional status of Anganwadi Children in Urban Mangalore – A cross sectional study Anat Physiol. 2017;7:259

11. Shanawaz M, Nasir AA, Sunder S, Khan M, Rani S, Padmanabha BV. An evaluation of nutritional status of children in Anganwadi Centre of Hyderabad district of Andhra Pradesh stateusing WHO z- score technique Glob J Med Public Health. 2013;2:1–6

12. Ministry of Women and Child Development. National Nutrition Mission: Administrative Guidelines. 2017Last accessed on 2018 Aug 12 Available from: http://wcdnicin/sites/default/files/Administrative_Guidelines_NNM-26022018pdf

13. International Institute for Population Sciences. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015–16: India. 2017Last accessed on 2018 Jul 05;1 Mumbai, India International Institute for Population Sciences Available from: http://wwwrchiipsorg/nfhs/reportshtml

14. Silva VG, Silva SG. Nutritional Status of Anganwadi Children under the Integrated child development services scheme in a rural area in Goa Int J Sci Stud. 2015;3:217–21

15. Kotabal R, Dasar P, Sonavane R. Study on prevalence and determinants of malnutrition among Anganwadi children of Nagavi Primary Health Centre area, Gadag Natl J Res Community Med. 2018;7:32–5

16. Yadav A, Dixit A. A study to assess the prevalence of malnutrition among under 5 year children at selected Anganwadi centres of Jaipur district with a view to develop an information booklet for parents Int J Med Health Res. 2017;3:78–9

17. Sahoo DP, Dehmubed A, Jajulwar MB. An epidemiological study of acute malnutrition in children of age 6 months to 5 years in an Urban Slum of Mumbai, Maharashtra J Datta Meghe Inst Med Sci Univ. 2017;12:181–6

18. Ahmed MA, Yadav SK, Reddy A. Prevalence and epidemiology of under nutrition amoug preschool children in a selected area Int J Contemp Med Res. 2016;3:1797–802

19. Gautam SK, Verma M, Barman SK, Arya AK. Nutritional status and its corelates in under five slum children of Kanpur Nagar, India Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2018;5:584–90

20. Meena S, Kaushal R, Saxena DM. Nutritional status of children under five year of age in Anganwadi Centres in Kolar area of Madhya Pradesh Natl J Community Med. 2015;6:114–9

21. Mamulwar MS, Rathod HK, Jethani S, Dhone A, Bakshi T, Lanjewar B, et al Nutritional status of under-five children in urban slums of Pune Int J Med Public Health. 2014;4:247–52

22. Priyanka R, Vincent V, Jini MP, Saju CR. An assessment of the nutritional status of underfive children in a rural area of Thrissur district, Kerala, India Int J Community Med Public Health. 2016;3:3479–86

Keywords:

Anganwadi; nutritional assessment; sociodemographic factors; undernutrition

© 2020 Indian Journal of Community Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer – Medknow

What is the most sensitive indicator of nutritional status?

The nutrition-focused physical examination (NFPE) is an essential component for diagnosing malnutrition. Focusing on general characteristics such as edema, muscle wasting and subcutaneous fat loss to specific micronutrient related deficiencies, the NFPE is very sensitive for assessing nutritional status.

What are the indicators of a child's nutritional status?

The nutritional status indicators for the CDC Growth Charts include obesity, overweight, underweight, and short stature. Percentiles are used to rank an individual or a group on a growth chart and indicate where either fits in the context of the reference population.

What is the most sensitive indicator of growth?

Rate of change in height (height velocity) is a more sensitive measure of growth than time-specific height measures. In general, healthy term infants and children grow about 2.5 cm/month between birth and 6 months, 1.3 cm/month from 7 to 12 months, and about 7.6 cm/year between 12 months and 10 years.

What is one of the most common nutritional problems in early childhood?

Some toddlers have nutritional problems that can have immediate and long-term effects on their health, growth and development. Food allergies, iron deficiency, tooth decay and constipation are common in the early years.